Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming

Share Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming on Facebook Share Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming on Twitter Share Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming on Linkedin Email Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming link
Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming







Important Notice

We are pleased to announce that the Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Project was approved at the May 27 Council meeting. Installation of the approved measures will begin in the summer of 2024.

Thank you to everyone who participated and provided valuable feedback.



Over the last few years, the Town conducted an operational safety review to assess the need for traffic calming measures within the Limehouse Hamlet. The review was initiated due to multiple concerns from residents regarding speeding, road safety and aggressive driving. A proposed traffic calming plan has been created to further support safety for all road users.

Consultation with the community is an important aspect of the Town’s Traffic Calming Implementation Protocol. Residents living within the neighbourhood and motorists driving on the affected roads are encouraged to participate in an in-person and/or online Public Information Center (PIC) to review the proposed traffic calming plan and provide feedback.

The in-person PIC will be on February 22 from 6 - 7:30 p.m. at the Limehouse Memorial Hall. A short presentation will commence at 6:30 p.m.

The online PIC presentation can be viewed on this page where residents can evaluate the proposed Traffic Calming Plan and provide input using the interactive display materials.

Residents are encouraged to provide comments in person at the Public Information Centre or within the Question and Comments section of this page. Comments will be accepted until March 31, 2024.

Road safety is a shared responsibility. Learn how to file a Road Watch Report and Traffic Concern Report to the Halton Regional Police Service (HRPS) and help keep our roads safe.








Important Notice

We are pleased to announce that the Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Project was approved at the May 27 Council meeting. Installation of the approved measures will begin in the summer of 2024.

Thank you to everyone who participated and provided valuable feedback.



Over the last few years, the Town conducted an operational safety review to assess the need for traffic calming measures within the Limehouse Hamlet. The review was initiated due to multiple concerns from residents regarding speeding, road safety and aggressive driving. A proposed traffic calming plan has been created to further support safety for all road users.

Consultation with the community is an important aspect of the Town’s Traffic Calming Implementation Protocol. Residents living within the neighbourhood and motorists driving on the affected roads are encouraged to participate in an in-person and/or online Public Information Center (PIC) to review the proposed traffic calming plan and provide feedback.

The in-person PIC will be on February 22 from 6 - 7:30 p.m. at the Limehouse Memorial Hall. A short presentation will commence at 6:30 p.m.

The online PIC presentation can be viewed on this page where residents can evaluate the proposed Traffic Calming Plan and provide input using the interactive display materials.

Residents are encouraged to provide comments in person at the Public Information Centre or within the Question and Comments section of this page. Comments will be accepted until March 31, 2024.

Road safety is a shared responsibility. Learn how to file a Road Watch Report and Traffic Concern Report to the Halton Regional Police Service (HRPS) and help keep our roads safe.


CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.

Ask questions or leave comments below and the Town's Project Manager will respond within five business days.

Please check the FAQ to see if your question is already posted.

  • Share I attended the meeting and heard the presentation and have these comments and questions: * The boundaries you are using for Limehouse do not reflect the actual residents who live in Limehouse. As was pointed out in the meeting, these dotted line boundaries are the old NEC boundaries. This means that many residents affected by speeding in Limehouse were left out of the original study area. As well, notice of the meeting was not sent by the town to all residents in Limehouse. Residents outside of the study area and those whose mail is delivered via postal box units by the school, etc. were left out. * I raised a question at the meeting about the speed cushions and their effectiveness in winter with snow and ice. I understand this question was captured in the meeting notes but I want to just raise it again since I think it could have an impact on plowing the road in winter and I do not it to be forgotten. See link to a report from Quebec on snow cushion as part of traffic calming- pg. 15. I would hope that further investigations on the use of these is done where snow is a regular occurrence (not Oakville as mentioned in the meeting where snow fall amounts are different than here in North Halton.) https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Berthod-C.-2011.pdf *There were comments at the meeting about more speed humps being needed on 5th Line and on 22nd Sideroad. I agree and would also like to point out that these are rural roads with no real shoulders and often not a place for pedestrians to move to in order to get out of the way of speeding. More speed humps to slow traffic in more places is needed to reflect the needs of the hikers and cyclists. *I am wondering about the necessity of signs announcing the traffic calming neighborhood- we have too many signs in some places now. The school zone and community safety zone signage with increased fines seem to be better in my opinion. *Permanent Radar Message Board- will this be like we have now on 22nd Sideroad or will it be different. The ones that flash red get more attention related to speed than just white signage when your speed is shown. There is one on the 4th line that used to flash red or green depending on your speed but now just shows red even when below the speed limit. That one does not seem to be working so I am curious what type you are proposing. * My last comment is in reference to the last paragraph on your web page for this study about road safety and the link to road watch. When several of the local residents were complaining about speeding and taking pics and licenses and sending them to a police contact over the last year, no one ever mentioned this site. And it was not highlighted at the meeting that I am aware of. This info needs to be widely circulated. Susan Cox, Kirkpatrick Lane on Facebook Share I attended the meeting and heard the presentation and have these comments and questions: * The boundaries you are using for Limehouse do not reflect the actual residents who live in Limehouse. As was pointed out in the meeting, these dotted line boundaries are the old NEC boundaries. This means that many residents affected by speeding in Limehouse were left out of the original study area. As well, notice of the meeting was not sent by the town to all residents in Limehouse. Residents outside of the study area and those whose mail is delivered via postal box units by the school, etc. were left out. * I raised a question at the meeting about the speed cushions and their effectiveness in winter with snow and ice. I understand this question was captured in the meeting notes but I want to just raise it again since I think it could have an impact on plowing the road in winter and I do not it to be forgotten. See link to a report from Quebec on snow cushion as part of traffic calming- pg. 15. I would hope that further investigations on the use of these is done where snow is a regular occurrence (not Oakville as mentioned in the meeting where snow fall amounts are different than here in North Halton.) https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Berthod-C.-2011.pdf *There were comments at the meeting about more speed humps being needed on 5th Line and on 22nd Sideroad. I agree and would also like to point out that these are rural roads with no real shoulders and often not a place for pedestrians to move to in order to get out of the way of speeding. More speed humps to slow traffic in more places is needed to reflect the needs of the hikers and cyclists. *I am wondering about the necessity of signs announcing the traffic calming neighborhood- we have too many signs in some places now. The school zone and community safety zone signage with increased fines seem to be better in my opinion. *Permanent Radar Message Board- will this be like we have now on 22nd Sideroad or will it be different. The ones that flash red get more attention related to speed than just white signage when your speed is shown. There is one on the 4th line that used to flash red or green depending on your speed but now just shows red even when below the speed limit. That one does not seem to be working so I am curious what type you are proposing. * My last comment is in reference to the last paragraph on your web page for this study about road safety and the link to road watch. When several of the local residents were complaining about speeding and taking pics and licenses and sending them to a police contact over the last year, no one ever mentioned this site. And it was not highlighted at the meeting that I am aware of. This info needs to be widely circulated. Susan Cox, Kirkpatrick Lane on Twitter Share I attended the meeting and heard the presentation and have these comments and questions: * The boundaries you are using for Limehouse do not reflect the actual residents who live in Limehouse. As was pointed out in the meeting, these dotted line boundaries are the old NEC boundaries. This means that many residents affected by speeding in Limehouse were left out of the original study area. As well, notice of the meeting was not sent by the town to all residents in Limehouse. Residents outside of the study area and those whose mail is delivered via postal box units by the school, etc. were left out. * I raised a question at the meeting about the speed cushions and their effectiveness in winter with snow and ice. I understand this question was captured in the meeting notes but I want to just raise it again since I think it could have an impact on plowing the road in winter and I do not it to be forgotten. See link to a report from Quebec on snow cushion as part of traffic calming- pg. 15. I would hope that further investigations on the use of these is done where snow is a regular occurrence (not Oakville as mentioned in the meeting where snow fall amounts are different than here in North Halton.) https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Berthod-C.-2011.pdf *There were comments at the meeting about more speed humps being needed on 5th Line and on 22nd Sideroad. I agree and would also like to point out that these are rural roads with no real shoulders and often not a place for pedestrians to move to in order to get out of the way of speeding. More speed humps to slow traffic in more places is needed to reflect the needs of the hikers and cyclists. *I am wondering about the necessity of signs announcing the traffic calming neighborhood- we have too many signs in some places now. The school zone and community safety zone signage with increased fines seem to be better in my opinion. *Permanent Radar Message Board- will this be like we have now on 22nd Sideroad or will it be different. The ones that flash red get more attention related to speed than just white signage when your speed is shown. There is one on the 4th line that used to flash red or green depending on your speed but now just shows red even when below the speed limit. That one does not seem to be working so I am curious what type you are proposing. * My last comment is in reference to the last paragraph on your web page for this study about road safety and the link to road watch. When several of the local residents were complaining about speeding and taking pics and licenses and sending them to a police contact over the last year, no one ever mentioned this site. And it was not highlighted at the meeting that I am aware of. This info needs to be widely circulated. Susan Cox, Kirkpatrick Lane on Linkedin Email I attended the meeting and heard the presentation and have these comments and questions: * The boundaries you are using for Limehouse do not reflect the actual residents who live in Limehouse. As was pointed out in the meeting, these dotted line boundaries are the old NEC boundaries. This means that many residents affected by speeding in Limehouse were left out of the original study area. As well, notice of the meeting was not sent by the town to all residents in Limehouse. Residents outside of the study area and those whose mail is delivered via postal box units by the school, etc. were left out. * I raised a question at the meeting about the speed cushions and their effectiveness in winter with snow and ice. I understand this question was captured in the meeting notes but I want to just raise it again since I think it could have an impact on plowing the road in winter and I do not it to be forgotten. See link to a report from Quebec on snow cushion as part of traffic calming- pg. 15. I would hope that further investigations on the use of these is done where snow is a regular occurrence (not Oakville as mentioned in the meeting where snow fall amounts are different than here in North Halton.) https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Berthod-C.-2011.pdf *There were comments at the meeting about more speed humps being needed on 5th Line and on 22nd Sideroad. I agree and would also like to point out that these are rural roads with no real shoulders and often not a place for pedestrians to move to in order to get out of the way of speeding. More speed humps to slow traffic in more places is needed to reflect the needs of the hikers and cyclists. *I am wondering about the necessity of signs announcing the traffic calming neighborhood- we have too many signs in some places now. The school zone and community safety zone signage with increased fines seem to be better in my opinion. *Permanent Radar Message Board- will this be like we have now on 22nd Sideroad or will it be different. The ones that flash red get more attention related to speed than just white signage when your speed is shown. There is one on the 4th line that used to flash red or green depending on your speed but now just shows red even when below the speed limit. That one does not seem to be working so I am curious what type you are proposing. * My last comment is in reference to the last paragraph on your web page for this study about road safety and the link to road watch. When several of the local residents were complaining about speeding and taking pics and licenses and sending them to a police contact over the last year, no one ever mentioned this site. And it was not highlighted at the meeting that I am aware of. This info needs to be widely circulated. Susan Cox, Kirkpatrick Lane link

    I attended the meeting and heard the presentation and have these comments and questions: * The boundaries you are using for Limehouse do not reflect the actual residents who live in Limehouse. As was pointed out in the meeting, these dotted line boundaries are the old NEC boundaries. This means that many residents affected by speeding in Limehouse were left out of the original study area. As well, notice of the meeting was not sent by the town to all residents in Limehouse. Residents outside of the study area and those whose mail is delivered via postal box units by the school, etc. were left out. * I raised a question at the meeting about the speed cushions and their effectiveness in winter with snow and ice. I understand this question was captured in the meeting notes but I want to just raise it again since I think it could have an impact on plowing the road in winter and I do not it to be forgotten. See link to a report from Quebec on snow cushion as part of traffic calming- pg. 15. I would hope that further investigations on the use of these is done where snow is a regular occurrence (not Oakville as mentioned in the meeting where snow fall amounts are different than here in North Halton.) https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Berthod-C.-2011.pdf *There were comments at the meeting about more speed humps being needed on 5th Line and on 22nd Sideroad. I agree and would also like to point out that these are rural roads with no real shoulders and often not a place for pedestrians to move to in order to get out of the way of speeding. More speed humps to slow traffic in more places is needed to reflect the needs of the hikers and cyclists. *I am wondering about the necessity of signs announcing the traffic calming neighborhood- we have too many signs in some places now. The school zone and community safety zone signage with increased fines seem to be better in my opinion. *Permanent Radar Message Board- will this be like we have now on 22nd Sideroad or will it be different. The ones that flash red get more attention related to speed than just white signage when your speed is shown. There is one on the 4th line that used to flash red or green depending on your speed but now just shows red even when below the speed limit. That one does not seem to be working so I am curious what type you are proposing. * My last comment is in reference to the last paragraph on your web page for this study about road safety and the link to road watch. When several of the local residents were complaining about speeding and taking pics and licenses and sending them to a police contact over the last year, no one ever mentioned this site. And it was not highlighted at the meeting that I am aware of. This info needs to be widely circulated. Susan Cox, Kirkpatrick Lane

    SusanCox asked 9 months ago

    Hello, Susan.

    Thank you kindly for taking the time provide us with your valuable feedback and comments regarding the proposed project. As previously mentioned, all feedback will be taken into consideration in preparation of the final recommendations report to Council. 

    Regarding the plowing concerns you brought forward, further discussion with our Public Works department has confirmed that the new speed cushions will not impede winter road maintenance operations.

    Lastly, I would like to mention that once the Final recommendations report is uploaded onto the Let's Talk HH project page we will be sending an email to everyone that attended the Public Information Centre. Notifications will also be sent to all the visitors of this page that have registered.

    Once that information reaches you, please feel free to share it with anyone that was is interested but was not advised.

    Once again thank you and all the best.

    Kind regards, 

    Roumen Kotev

  • Share I was at the meeting but had to leave early, my question is after the fire department checks out the lay out , town council approval of it. When would construction begin? Thanks Douglas Jones on Facebook Share I was at the meeting but had to leave early, my question is after the fire department checks out the lay out , town council approval of it. When would construction begin? Thanks Douglas Jones on Twitter Share I was at the meeting but had to leave early, my question is after the fire department checks out the lay out , town council approval of it. When would construction begin? Thanks Douglas Jones on Linkedin Email I was at the meeting but had to leave early, my question is after the fire department checks out the lay out , town council approval of it. When would construction begin? Thanks Douglas Jones link

    I was at the meeting but had to leave early, my question is after the fire department checks out the lay out , town council approval of it. When would construction begin? Thanks Douglas Jones

    Douglas asked 9 months ago

    Good morning, Douglas.

    If the proposed measures are endorsed by Council we are anticipating the installation to begin after June 17, 2024.

  • Share Hi. I live at 11427 22 sde rde. It seems to be just outside the study area. I think the area should have been expanded to the border at the limehouse sign or where the 50km zone starts. Could we consider another speed bump there as well to slow them co.ing in? Thanks Eric Namink on Facebook Share Hi. I live at 11427 22 sde rde. It seems to be just outside the study area. I think the area should have been expanded to the border at the limehouse sign or where the 50km zone starts. Could we consider another speed bump there as well to slow them co.ing in? Thanks Eric Namink on Twitter Share Hi. I live at 11427 22 sde rde. It seems to be just outside the study area. I think the area should have been expanded to the border at the limehouse sign or where the 50km zone starts. Could we consider another speed bump there as well to slow them co.ing in? Thanks Eric Namink on Linkedin Email Hi. I live at 11427 22 sde rde. It seems to be just outside the study area. I think the area should have been expanded to the border at the limehouse sign or where the 50km zone starts. Could we consider another speed bump there as well to slow them co.ing in? Thanks Eric Namink link

    Hi. I live at 11427 22 sde rde. It seems to be just outside the study area. I think the area should have been expanded to the border at the limehouse sign or where the 50km zone starts. Could we consider another speed bump there as well to slow them co.ing in? Thanks Eric Namink

    Eric Namink asked 9 months ago

    Hi Eric. Thank you for providing us with your comments. 

    Your valuable feedback will be taken into consideration in preparation of the final recommendation report to Council.

  • Share I have jus reviewed your proposed Traffic Calming installations, and feel you are missing one of the major locations. We live at the base of the hill, coming down from the Conservation Park, there is a BLIND corner just before the hill north of 12230, there has been numerous times when exiting our driveway that we have been confronted with speeding vehicles, resulting in aggressive breaking to avoid a collision. The installation of a Speed Hump at the opposite end of the street will not address this issue. Please review and advise. on Facebook Share I have jus reviewed your proposed Traffic Calming installations, and feel you are missing one of the major locations. We live at the base of the hill, coming down from the Conservation Park, there is a BLIND corner just before the hill north of 12230, there has been numerous times when exiting our driveway that we have been confronted with speeding vehicles, resulting in aggressive breaking to avoid a collision. The installation of a Speed Hump at the opposite end of the street will not address this issue. Please review and advise. on Twitter Share I have jus reviewed your proposed Traffic Calming installations, and feel you are missing one of the major locations. We live at the base of the hill, coming down from the Conservation Park, there is a BLIND corner just before the hill north of 12230, there has been numerous times when exiting our driveway that we have been confronted with speeding vehicles, resulting in aggressive breaking to avoid a collision. The installation of a Speed Hump at the opposite end of the street will not address this issue. Please review and advise. on Linkedin Email I have jus reviewed your proposed Traffic Calming installations, and feel you are missing one of the major locations. We live at the base of the hill, coming down from the Conservation Park, there is a BLIND corner just before the hill north of 12230, there has been numerous times when exiting our driveway that we have been confronted with speeding vehicles, resulting in aggressive breaking to avoid a collision. The installation of a Speed Hump at the opposite end of the street will not address this issue. Please review and advise. link

    I have jus reviewed your proposed Traffic Calming installations, and feel you are missing one of the major locations. We live at the base of the hill, coming down from the Conservation Park, there is a BLIND corner just before the hill north of 12230, there has been numerous times when exiting our driveway that we have been confronted with speeding vehicles, resulting in aggressive breaking to avoid a collision. The installation of a Speed Hump at the opposite end of the street will not address this issue. Please review and advise.

    Brian Hutchison asked 9 months ago

    Good afternoon, Brian

    Thank you for taking the time to review the proposed plan and provide us with your comments.

    In the past we have not had any speeding concerns in the section of Fifth Line between the curve and the bridge since it is a short section.

    Havig said that staff will collect speed data to determine if the screening criterion for the implementation of traffic calming devices is warranted.

    The trigger would be an Operating Speed (speed at or below which 85 % of vehicles travel) of 65 km/h or higher.

    Once staff has collected and reviewed the data a determination will be made if an additional speed hump is warranted.

    If you have any questions, please let me know.

    Kind regards,

  • Share I submitted a few days ago in favor of speedbumps. After rethinking and speaking to some locals i would be against this as we have waited so long for 22nd sideroad to be repaved and beautified. Why would we change. Believe other calming traffic methods would be best if the trucks would simply take hwy 7 or 17 sideroad. omit 5th line and 4th line. on Facebook Share I submitted a few days ago in favor of speedbumps. After rethinking and speaking to some locals i would be against this as we have waited so long for 22nd sideroad to be repaved and beautified. Why would we change. Believe other calming traffic methods would be best if the trucks would simply take hwy 7 or 17 sideroad. omit 5th line and 4th line. on Twitter Share I submitted a few days ago in favor of speedbumps. After rethinking and speaking to some locals i would be against this as we have waited so long for 22nd sideroad to be repaved and beautified. Why would we change. Believe other calming traffic methods would be best if the trucks would simply take hwy 7 or 17 sideroad. omit 5th line and 4th line. on Linkedin Email I submitted a few days ago in favor of speedbumps. After rethinking and speaking to some locals i would be against this as we have waited so long for 22nd sideroad to be repaved and beautified. Why would we change. Believe other calming traffic methods would be best if the trucks would simply take hwy 7 or 17 sideroad. omit 5th line and 4th line. link

    I submitted a few days ago in favor of speedbumps. After rethinking and speaking to some locals i would be against this as we have waited so long for 22nd sideroad to be repaved and beautified. Why would we change. Believe other calming traffic methods would be best if the trucks would simply take hwy 7 or 17 sideroad. omit 5th line and 4th line.

    Limehouse89 asked 9 months ago

    Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your feedback.

  • Share Will speed bumps be added in front of the school and perhaps near Elizabeth St towards Hwy 7 going to Georgetown? on Facebook Share Will speed bumps be added in front of the school and perhaps near Elizabeth St towards Hwy 7 going to Georgetown? on Twitter Share Will speed bumps be added in front of the school and perhaps near Elizabeth St towards Hwy 7 going to Georgetown? on Linkedin Email Will speed bumps be added in front of the school and perhaps near Elizabeth St towards Hwy 7 going to Georgetown? link

    Will speed bumps be added in front of the school and perhaps near Elizabeth St towards Hwy 7 going to Georgetown?

    Limehouse89 asked 9 months ago

    As part of the Limehouse Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Plan staff is recommending the installation of two (2) speed cushions on 22 Side Road east of Fifth Line.

    The first one will be located in between the two school parking lot entrances. The proposed location for the second speed cushion is near Elizabeth Street.

  • Share Is there a "Post Screening" protocol to determine if the "Non-Intrusive / Intrusive" Calming devices have delivered the desired results? If after a period of time, the desired result is achieved, can/should the calming devices be removed? on Facebook Share Is there a "Post Screening" protocol to determine if the "Non-Intrusive / Intrusive" Calming devices have delivered the desired results? If after a period of time, the desired result is achieved, can/should the calming devices be removed? on Twitter Share Is there a "Post Screening" protocol to determine if the "Non-Intrusive / Intrusive" Calming devices have delivered the desired results? If after a period of time, the desired result is achieved, can/should the calming devices be removed? on Linkedin Email Is there a "Post Screening" protocol to determine if the "Non-Intrusive / Intrusive" Calming devices have delivered the desired results? If after a period of time, the desired result is achieved, can/should the calming devices be removed? link

    Is there a "Post Screening" protocol to determine if the "Non-Intrusive / Intrusive" Calming devices have delivered the desired results? If after a period of time, the desired result is achieved, can/should the calming devices be removed?

    Mike Jolliffe asked 10 months ago

    Hello Mike and thank you for taking the time to review the proposed project.

    There is a post-implementation data collection that allows staff to determine whether the implemented measures achieved the desired results. Those results will be posted on the Let's Talk Halton Hills Project Page as a before and after comparison. Once staff determines that intrusive traffic calming measures are warranted, those become permanent and will not be removed.

    Kind regards.

  • Share Unfortunately I am not able to attend the February 22nd meeting. Having being a resident of Limehouse for over 35 years we are still experiencing dump truck traffic, large delivery or transport trucks crossing the 5th line bridge and speeding cars/trucks. My suggestion is at a minimum to add speed bumps at 5th and 22nd, larger signs for the dump trucks. Hoping there will be a resolution to our traffic woes. on Facebook Share Unfortunately I am not able to attend the February 22nd meeting. Having being a resident of Limehouse for over 35 years we are still experiencing dump truck traffic, large delivery or transport trucks crossing the 5th line bridge and speeding cars/trucks. My suggestion is at a minimum to add speed bumps at 5th and 22nd, larger signs for the dump trucks. Hoping there will be a resolution to our traffic woes. on Twitter Share Unfortunately I am not able to attend the February 22nd meeting. Having being a resident of Limehouse for over 35 years we are still experiencing dump truck traffic, large delivery or transport trucks crossing the 5th line bridge and speeding cars/trucks. My suggestion is at a minimum to add speed bumps at 5th and 22nd, larger signs for the dump trucks. Hoping there will be a resolution to our traffic woes. on Linkedin Email Unfortunately I am not able to attend the February 22nd meeting. Having being a resident of Limehouse for over 35 years we are still experiencing dump truck traffic, large delivery or transport trucks crossing the 5th line bridge and speeding cars/trucks. My suggestion is at a minimum to add speed bumps at 5th and 22nd, larger signs for the dump trucks. Hoping there will be a resolution to our traffic woes. link

    Unfortunately I am not able to attend the February 22nd meeting. Having being a resident of Limehouse for over 35 years we are still experiencing dump truck traffic, large delivery or transport trucks crossing the 5th line bridge and speeding cars/trucks. My suggestion is at a minimum to add speed bumps at 5th and 22nd, larger signs for the dump trucks. Hoping there will be a resolution to our traffic woes.

    Limehouse89 asked 9 months ago

    Thank you for taking the time to review the proposed measures and provide us with much valuable feedback. All comments will be taken into consideration in preparation of the final recommendations report to Council.

    Sincerely,

    Roumen Kotev